On 04/11/2024 17:53, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 9:19 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
It's looking to me like there's just too much cruft in the quest to
avoid having to reach consensus on new syntax. This might be a mistake.
Is it possible to backtrack on that decision?
There's also the patch that Heikki posted to wait using a
protocol-level facility.
It was Peter E
Maybe that's just a better fit and we don't need either a procedure
or new syntax.
I think it would still be good to expose the feature at SQL level too.
Makes it easier to test and makes it usable without client library
changes, for example.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)
