On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:57 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > > There's also the patch that Heikki posted to wait using a > > protocol-level facility. > > It was Peter E
Oops. > > Maybe that's just a better fit and we don't need either a procedure > > or new syntax. > I think it would still be good to expose the feature at SQL level too. > Makes it easier to test and makes it usable without client library > changes, for example. OK. Well then I agree with Álvaro. If using a procedure isn't working out nicely, it's better to consider alternatives than to force a round peg into a square hole (with due regard for the fact that you can fit anything through the square hole if you make the square hole big enough...). -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
