On 2024-12-02 17:42:33 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I'll proceed with improving that (in master only, don't think we need it in > back branches, at least not today) unless somebody pushes back soon.
+1
On 2024-12-02 17:42:33 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I'll proceed with improving that (in master only, don't think we need it in > back branches, at least not today) unless somebody pushes back soon.
+1