On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 4:22 AM, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 09:38:38AM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote: >> Currently log_autovacuum_min_duration log message has no difference >> between regular autovacuum and to prevent wraparound autovacuum. There >> are important differences, for example, backend can automatically >> cancel regular autovacuum, but not anti-wraparound. I think it is >> useful indicate anti-wraparound in logs. > > Yes, a bit more verbosity would be nice for that. Using the term > "anti-wraparound" directly in the logs makes the most sense?
I'm not particularly in love with that terminology. I doubt that it's very clear to the average user. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
