Hi,
On 2025-03-17 16:17:03 +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> As I understand it, Andres agrees that the feature is unsalvageable in
> backbranches ("don't think there's a realistic way to fix it"). Andres
> then continues to elaborate that even if the feature were salvageable,
> it wouldn't contain much of the current code.
Correct.
> My patch removes the feature altogether in master and disables the
> feature in the backbranches in the patches that were built against the
> backbranches, which seems to match Andres' comments.
Agreed.
> @vignesh, could you elaborate on what about Andres' comments I need to
> address in my patch?
I don't think there are any...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
