On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 5:39 PM Ryo Kanbayashi <kanbayashi....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:01 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:49AM +0900, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote: > > > Putting a bit of context here. Most of the Postgres hackers based in > > > Japan had a meeting last Friday, and Kanbayashi-san has asked me about > > > patches that introduce to simpler code paths in the tree that could be > > > worked on for this release. I've mentioned this thread to him. > > > > > > > Just to let you know, my action is not intended to steal your > > > > contribution but to prevent your good idea from being lost. > > > > > > Authors and reviewers get busy because of life and work matters, and > > > contributions are listed in the commit logs for everybody who > > > participates. If you can help move this patch forward, thanks a lot > > > for the help! IMO, that would be great. The patch set still needs > > > more reorganization and adjustments, but I think that we can get it > > > there > > Michael, > CC: Torsten > > I reviewed the patch and add some modification described below. > > part of https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Zz2AE7NKKLIZTtEh%40paquier.xyz > > +# This tests "service" and "servicefile" > > > > You are introducing tests for the existing "service", as well as tests > > for the new "servicefile". Could it be possible to split that into > > two patches for clarity? You'd want one to provide coverage for the > > existing features (PGSERVICEFILE, PGSERVICE and connection parameter > > "service"), then add tests for the new feature "servicename" with its > > libpq implementation. That would make your main patch simpler, as > > well. > > > > +open my $fh, '>', $srvfile or die $!; > > +print $fh "[my_srv]\n"; > > +print $fh +($node->connstr =~ s/ /\n/gr), "\n"; > > +close $fh; > > > > Sure that's OK on Windows where we have CRLFs, not just LFs? > > I did... > * Split the patch to two patches > 1) regression test of existing features. > 2) adding servicefile option feature, its regression test and etc > * Add codes which care new line code of Windows > * Add comments and apply formatter :)
Sorry, I found a miss on 006_service.pl. Fixed patch is attached... --- Great Regards, Ryo Kanbayashi
v2-0001-add-regression-test-of-service-option.patch
Description: Binary data