On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 06:31:14PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > With all that in mind and more documentation added to the test, I've > applied 0001, so let's see what the buildfarm has to say. The CI was > stable, so it's a start.
The buildfarm (particularly the Windows members that worried me), have reported back and I am not seeing any failures, so we should be good with 72c2f36d5727. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
