On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 09:40:24AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > So, given the precedent of vacuum_index_cleanup and the above, we should > turn this into an enum that accepts all existing boolean literal inputs and > also has a undocumented "unset" default value that the user is not allowed > to explicitly set but instead only gets used to resolve an unset reloption > at runtime.
This would involve adding a field to relopt_enum_elt_def to declare a value as "unsettable," right? That seems feasible, but IMHO it's comparable to adding a field to reopt_parse_elt. -- nathan
