В письме от понедельник, 24 марта 2025 г. 19:00:51 MSK пользователь Álvaro Herrera написал:
> I don't understand why this shouldn't work exactly like > vacuum_index_cleanup (cf. vacuum_rel lines 2170ff). That would require > no new mechanism. In my opinion it should. "no new mechanism" is good. "new mechanism" is bad. :-) -- Nikolay Shaplov aka Nataraj Fuzzing Engineer at Postgres Professional Matrix IM: @dhyan:nataraj.su
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
