On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:34 PM Nikolay Shaplov <dh...@nataraj.su> wrote: > В письме от среда, 26 марта 2025 г. 21:16:20 MSK пользователь Robert Haas > написал: > > The reason why I felt that way is > > because you were using what seemed to me to be very strong language > > over what seemed to me to be a very minor issue. > > Being not native speaker has it's own difficulties. Plus possible cultural > differences and so on. I feel emotions about "my precious thing have been > broken for no reason at all", and this should affect the text, and I guess I > can not properly keep proper emotional degree as I do not feel fine meaning of > the words. Yes, I feel emotions, No, I am not yelling, and certainly I am not > yelling as final argument.
OK, fair enough. > Can you please skip the form, that may be not perfect, and see the content. I > hope that I managed to express the core idea quite clear. Honestly, I'm still pretty baffled. I understand that different people may have different stylistic preferences here, and that is fair enough, but I personally think what Nathan did is more elegant than inventing an enum type with three possible values. Even if a majority of people feel otherwise, why is it worth arguing about? I cannot see how this really makes any great difference. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
