On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 9:00 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Hello > > I don't understand why this shouldn't work exactly like > vacuum_index_cleanup (cf. vacuum_rel lines 2170ff). That would require > no new mechanism. > > That reloption is already an enum and there is no GUC to defer to when the value is unset. It doesn't seem like an equivalent scenario. AUTO is a perfectly useful value as opposed to an undocumented sentinel for unset/missing. David J.
