On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 10:15 AM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Well, if we think we are going to do that, it seems we would need a > different architecture than the one being proposed for PG 18, which > could lead to a lot of user/developer API churn.
A major goal of the current patch proposal is to explicitly hide this from the end-user and public APIs. So it can be changed without public breakage. It can't be hidden from packagers, of course, but that's the point of the feature request. --Jacob
