On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:32 AM Wolfgang Walther <walt...@technowledgy.de> wrote:
> This means that shipping another .so file will not happen with this approach. 
> Assuming OAuth will be picked up by some of the bigger providers, that 
> would... make me feel quite bad about it, actually.

It occurs to me that I didn't respond to this point explicitly. I
would like to avoid making your life harder.

Would anybody following along be opposed to a situation where
- dynamiclib builds go through the dlopen() shim
- staticlib builds always rely on statically linked symbols

Or do we need to be able to mix and match?

--Jacob


Reply via email to