On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:32 AM Wolfgang Walther <walt...@technowledgy.de> wrote: > This means that shipping another .so file will not happen with this approach. > Assuming OAuth will be picked up by some of the bigger providers, that > would... make me feel quite bad about it, actually.
It occurs to me that I didn't respond to this point explicitly. I would like to avoid making your life harder. Would anybody following along be opposed to a situation where - dynamiclib builds go through the dlopen() shim - staticlib builds always rely on statically linked symbols Or do we need to be able to mix and match? --Jacob