Re: Jacob Champion > I think the system is overconstrained at that point. If you want to > support clients that delay-load the ABI they're compiled against, > _and_ have them continue to work seamlessly after the system has > upgraded the ABI underneath them, without restarting the client... is > there any option other than side-by-side installation?
My point is that we should be trying to change the ABI-as-coded-in-the- filename as rarely as possible. Then side-by-side should not be required. Christoph
