> On 30 Apr 2025, at 19:59, Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> > wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:55 AM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote:
>> Nitpick, but it won't be .so everywhere. Would this be clearar if spelled >> out >> with something like "do not rely on libpq-int.h when building libpq-oauth as >> dynamic shared lib"? > > I went with "do not rely on libpq-int.h in dynamic builds of > libpq-oauth", since devs are hopefully going to be the only people who > see it. I've also fixed up an errant #endif label right above it. That's indeed better than my suggestion. > I'd ideally like to get a working split in for beta. +Many > Barring > objections, I plan to get this pushed tomorrow so that the buildfarm > has time to highlight any corner cases well before the Saturday > freeze. I'll try to kick the tyres a bit more as well. -- Daniel Gustafsson
