On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 9:21 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Is that solving a real-world problem? If it is, shouldn't we be > looking for a different approach that doesn't require such a huge > amount of memory?
Upthread, Heikki said that this function currently fails with shared_buffers>409GB. While I'm not opposed to a more efficient solution, it seems reasonable to me to suppose that if you've got shared_buffers>409GB, you're able to afford having this function use >1GB. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
