Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I think the proposed patch should be committed and back-patched, after > fixing it so that it's pgindent-clean and adding a comment. Does > anyone have strong objection to that?
Not here. I do wonder if we can't find a more memory-efficient way,
but I concur that any such change would likely not be back-patch
material.
regards, tom lane
