On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:42 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:08:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > I have applied 0001 for now to add ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE. Attached is > > the remaining piece. > > And the second piece is now applied as of e2bab2d79204. > -- > Michael
Hi, Should we consider preventing tab completion for PARTITION BY immediately after CREATE TABLE name (...)? Or is it fine to leave it as is, given that it's syntactically correct? -- Best regards, Shinya Kato NTT OSS Center
