On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:55 PM Shinya Kato <shinya11.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:42 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:08:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > I have applied 0001 for now to add ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE. Attached is > > > the remaining piece. > > > > And the second piece is now applied as of e2bab2d79204. > > -- > > Michael > > Hi, > > Should we consider preventing tab completion for PARTITION BY > immediately after CREATE TABLE name (...)? Or is it fine to leave it > as is, given that it's syntactically correct?
Sorry. CREATE TABLE name (...) -> CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE name (...) -- Best regards, Shinya Kato NTT OSS Center
