On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:18:18AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Knowing that I'm indirectly responsible for this mess, I would like to > take care of that myself. Would that be OK for you?
I would be grateful if you took care of it. > Another approach that we could use is an injection point with some > LOGs that show some information based on what VacuumParams holds. > That would be the cheapest method (no need for any data), and entirely > stable as we would look at the stack. Perhaps going down to that is > not really necessary for the sake of this thread. +1 for this. I did something similar to verify the other bugs I reported, and this seems far easier to maintain than potentially-unstable tests that require lots of setup and that depend on secondary effects. -- nathan
