> On 27 Jun 2025, at 14:25, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > Thoughts or comments? I'm +1 on having full-fledged injection points in back branches where possible. Right now I'm debugging a PG-17(probably) problem where injection preloading would be handy (though functionality is available via hacks, just a little more work). But are you going to backpatch all new features of injection points in future? It's potentially x6 more work. Thanks! Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
- Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STA... Michael Paquier
- Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities to R... Andrey Borodin
- Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities ... Michael Paquier