> On 27 Jun 2025, at 14:25, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> 
> Thoughts or comments?

I'm +1 on having full-fledged injection points in back branches where possible. 
Right now I'm debugging a PG-17(probably) problem where injection preloading 
would be handy (though functionality is available via hacks, just a little more 
work).

But are you going to backpatch all new features of injection points in future? 
It's potentially x6 more work.

Thanks!


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Reply via email to