On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 02:45:58PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote: > I'm +1 on having full-fledged injection points in back branches > where possible. Right now I'm debugging a PG-17(probably) problem > where injection preloading would be handy (though functionality is > available via hacks, just a little more work). > > But are you going to backpatch all new features of injection points > in future? It's potentially x6 more work.
That may be nice, but I'd be interested in seeing how things evolve across v17 first before taking a decision for older branches. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
