On Sat, 12 Jul 2025 at 16:15, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I like the idea, especially the date variant. Unlike Tom, I'm not > particularly concerned about breakage of existing scripts, as > most already are working just fine with raw numbers and I don't see this > patch breaking them. > > In a selfish vein, I would use the "date" and timestamp variants a lot. I > would use the "time" ones seldom to never.
But it's completely trivial to emulate random(min_date, max_date), just by doing min_date + random(0, max_date - min_date) Is it really worth adding a core function for that? Regards, Dean
