Greg Sabino Mullane <htamf...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 3:21 AM Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Is it really worth adding a core function for that?
> Yes, I think it is. It is also trivial to get a random int from 50 to 100
> with
> 50 + floor(random() * 51)
> but random(50,100) is so much nicer.
I won't object to adding this for date/timestamp/timestamptz, but
I don't really believe that the time/timetz variants are worth the
code space. I think the latter two would also have definitional
issues because of the modulo behavior of those types' underlying
arithmetic.
regards, tom lane
