On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 3:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 11:46 AM shveta malik <shveta.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 7) > > Shall we rename 'max_conflict_retention_duration' to > > 'max_conflict_info_retention_duration' as the latter one is more > > clear? > > > > Before bikeshedding on the name of this option, I would like us to > once again consider whether we should provide this option at > subscription-level or GUC? >
Now that we decided that we would like to go with the subscription option. The other alternative to name this new option could be max_retention_duration. The explanation should clarify that it is used with the retain_dead_tuples option. I think the other proposed names appear a bit long to me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
