On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:01:53 +0530 Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > By the way, I think we can fix this also by clearing the header information > > of the last > > page instead of setting a checksum to the unused page although I am not > > sure which way > > is better. > > > > I think that can complicate the WAL logging of this operation which we > are able to deal easily with log_newpage and it sounds quite hacky. > The fix I have posted seems better, but I am open to suggestions. Thank you for your explanation. I understood this way could make the codes complicated, so I think the way you posted is better. Regards, -- Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>
