On Sunday, September 28, 2025, jian he <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since we already support INCLUDING STORAGE, I’m not sure that > INCLUDING STORAGE PARAMETER is the right syntax to go with. >
I’d just call it “including parameters”; sure, all of the existing ones are storage related, but if there were non-storage ones we’d include those as well, so qualifying with a parameter type doesn’t seem correct. David J.
