On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 2:04 AM Shinya Kato <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you for the patch. I have one comment.
>
> +       if (lag_tracker->overflowed[head].lsn > lsn)
> +           return now - lag_tracker->overflowed[head].time;
>
> Could this return a negative value if the clock somehow went
> backwards? The original code returns -1 in this case, so I'm curious
> about this.

Thanks for the review!

Yes, you're right. So I've updated the patch so that -1 is returned
when the current time is earlier than the time in the overflow entry,
treating it as "no new sample found".

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao

Attachment: v3-0001-Fix-stalled-lag-columns-in-pg_stat_replication-wh.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to