On Oct 20, 2025, at 19:07, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, but let's get v18 in shape first. I imagine the back branches > will require some effort to fill in the correct reference commits. > I was expecting we'd commit initial values pointing at the .0 releases > and then seeing what the ABI checker moans about in each branch …
FWIW they all fail. I pinned them all to the .1 tags for a couple days last month. Results: curiously, all the back branches failed when comparing to their .1 tags. * [REL_18_RC1 => c70b6db](https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=baza&dt=2025-09-05%2013%3A10%3A34&stg=abi-compliance-check) * [REL_17_1 => 6195afb](https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=baza&dt=2025-09-05%2012%3A54%3A38&stg=abi-compliance-check) * [REL_16_1 => 21a61b8](https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=baza&dt=2025-09-05%2012%3A37%3A45&stg=abi-compliance-check) * [REL_15_1 => f871fba](https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=baza&dt=2025-09-05%2012%3A21%3A55&stg=abi-compliance-check) * [REL_14_1 => ea65c88](https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=baza&dt=2025-09-05%2012%3A10%3A11&stg=abi-compliance-check) * [REL_13_1 => dbef9cb](https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=baza&dt=2025-09-05%2012%3A00%3A02&stg=abi-compliance-check) D
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
