On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 04:13:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I propose that we should make .abi-compliance-history point at these > commits rather than REL_17_6 et al. If there is anything later than > this that affected ABI, it'd be worth finding out I think, even though > we might choose not to do anything about it. (In effect, we'd be > starting the ABI compliance histories there rather than all the way > back at the .0 releases.)
WFM. I'll make it so. I see that baza is currently using the latest tags for <v18. David, will it start using the .abi-compliance-history file on the rest of the back-branches once it is added? -- nathan
