On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:36 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just to confirm - you'd prefer backpatching errhint_internal() to v17 and > > earlier branches, and then updating the patch to use it to avoid double > > translation, right? > > Exactly, but I want to ask other Seniors as well. >
I don't think it is important enough to backpatch errhint_internal to v17 and earlier branches. We can let double translation happen with the use of errhint or we can even consider this as a HEAD only improvement because this is not a blocking issue even when it happens. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
