On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:36 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Just to confirm - you'd prefer backpatching errhint_internal() to v17 and > > > earlier branches, and then updating the patch to use it to avoid double > > > translation, right? > > > > Exactly, but I want to ask other Seniors as well. > > > > I don't think it is important enough to backpatch errhint_internal to > v17 and earlier branches. We can let double translation happen with > the use of errhint or we can even consider this as a HEAD only > improvement because this is not a blocking issue even when it happens.
+1 So let's push the current patch, including only the cosmetic indentation changes suggested by Hayato-san. *If* we later reach consensus on backpatching errhint_internal(), we can handle that separately. Since another patch [1] seems to depend on this one, it's better not to delay committing it. Regards, [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAA5-nLCeO4MQzWipCXH58qf0arruiw0OeUc1+Q=Z=4GM+=v...@mail.gmail.com -- Fujii Masao
