On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:22:29PM +0200, David E. Wheeler wrote: > I suggest mentioning that new entries should be at the top, that the list > should be in reverse chronological order.
I felt that this was already covered in the existing commentary. > Otherwise this looks great, love seeing it! Thanks for looking. Now that we have a new run from baza that appears to be using the updated baseline, I've committed the remaining patches. For the rest of the back-branches, I'm considering starting with a baseline of the latest minor version stamps. While it would be nice to have a comprehensive history of the ABI compatibility for each major version, we've lived this long without it, and I think it's unlikely that we'd act on any breakages that predate the latest release set. Thoughts? -- nathan
