On 4 September 2018 at 19:31, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2018/08/24 7:22, David Rowley wrote: >> On 24 August 2018 at 02:26, Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> One of the patches I sent last week does the same thing, among a >>> couple of other things with regard to handling relations in the >>> executor. On a cursory look at the patch, your take of it looks >>> better than mine. Will test tomorrow. Here is a link to my email: >>> >>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e...@lab.ntt.co.jp >>> >>> 4th of my patches implements the array'fication of executor's range table. >> >> Sorry, didn't realise. I'll withdraw this and review yours during the >> upcoming 'fest. > > Since your patch implemented the idea in a better manner, I'm thinking I > should merge it with mine. Is that okay with you?
Feel free to do that. I've not yet looked at your patch. I was planning on looking at your partition planning performance improvements patches first. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
