On 2018/09/04 17:14, David Rowley wrote: > On 4 September 2018 at 19:31, Amit Langote > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> On 2018/08/24 7:22, David Rowley wrote: >>> On 24 August 2018 at 02:26, Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> One of the patches I sent last week does the same thing, among a >>>> couple of other things with regard to handling relations in the >>>> executor. On a cursory look at the patch, your take of it looks >>>> better than mine. Will test tomorrow. Here is a link to my email: >>>> >>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e...@lab.ntt.co.jp >>>> >>>> 4th of my patches implements the array'fication of executor's range table. >>> >>> Sorry, didn't realise. I'll withdraw this and review yours during the >>> upcoming 'fest. >> >> Since your patch implemented the idea in a better manner, I'm thinking I >> should merge it with mine. Is that okay with you? > > Feel free to do that.
Okay, will do. > I've not yet looked at your patch. I was > planning on looking at your partition planning performance > improvements patches first. Great, thanks. Regards, Amit