On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 04:28:51PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > With that said, a v18 for the first two patches with the input > functions. Comments and/or opinions?
Okay. I have gone other these two and after an extra round of polishing, mainly around comments (some suggested by Chao, actually), style, a fix for the test with valid UTF8 sequences failing in non-UTF8 databases, plus a few more tests that were missing, I have applied the two patches for the input functions. Perhaps these will need some adjustments, but I also see little point in moving on with these based on the coverage we have and how the code is shaped. Could you rebase the rest of the patch set for the three remaining pieces, Corey? You will also need to address some of the comments from Chao based on a review of v16, that were not addressed as of v17. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
