>
>
> non-UTF8 databases, plus a few more tests that were missing, I have
> applied the two patches for the input functions.
>

I've reviewed what you committed and it looks good to me aside from the one
nitpick I already made.


> Perhaps these will need some adjustments, but I also see little point
> in moving on with these based on the coverage we have and how the code
> is shaped.  Could you rebase the rest of the patch set for the three
> remaining pieces, Corey?  You will also need to address some of the
> comments from Chao based on a review of v16, that were not addressed
> as of v17.
>

+1

Reply via email to