On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 4:13 AM Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]> wrote: > This function is already exercised with the tests added in f2464997644c so > that > looks ok to me. > > Maybe Jacob or Andrew have some thoughts to share?
Ooh, blast from the past! You've found my very first Postgres review. I do not remember it at all. :D Your v2-0005 looks more correct (and less confusing) to me. I'm not qualified to comment on the historical behavior of citext+collations. --Jacob
