I wrote: > cfarm119 soon reminded me that I'd forgotten about the lgamma(NaN) > problem discussed in [1]. I'm inclined to go ahead and push the > patch shown there.
[ time passes ... ] OK, cfarm119 is also happy, given the addition
of that patch.
So we should be good to go on re-enabling douc to run on master.
(BTW, it looks like it hasn't run on the back branches either
for a couple of weeks?)
regards, tom lane
