On 2026-Feb-27, Fujii Masao wrote: > I'm fine with this direction, but I think it should be handled as a separate > improvement to the \d meta-commands, rather than as part of the current patch > extending \dRp+, \dRs+, and \dX+.
> I'm thinking to first commit the v3 patch so that comments on publications, > subscriptions, and extended statistics can be viewed via \d. After that, > we can consider a broader overhaul of the \d commands and how comments are > displayed, as discussed. No objection to that. Do you intend to work on that yourself, or should we seek volunteers? -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
