On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 8:09 AM Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm fine with this direction, but I think it should be handled as a separate > improvement to the \d meta-commands, rather than as part of the current patch > extending \dRp+, \dRs+, and \dX+. > > I'm thinking to first commit the v3 patch so that comments on publications, > subscriptions, and extended statistics can be viewed via \d.
I've pushed the v3 patch. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao
