> > It says “Each is indexed by ProcNumber”, but it’s no longer accurate for 
> > OldestMemberMXactId prepared-xact entries, which now use index (procno - 
> > FIRST_PREPARED_XACT_PROC_NUMBER).
>
> Fixed those and some other comment work, and pushed. Thanks!
>

Thanks! what are your thoughts about adding a test like the one
here [1] ? This allows us to test correct handling of prepared
transaction dummy procs. The asserts added will not cover
this case.

What do you think?

[1] 
[https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA5RZ0twq5bNMq0r0QNoopQnAEv%2BJ3qJNCrLs7HVqTEntBhJ%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com]

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)


Reply via email to