02.03.2026 22:09, Sami Imseih пишет: >>> It says “Each is indexed by ProcNumber”, but it’s no longer accurate for >>> OldestMemberMXactId prepared-xact entries, which now use index (procno - >>> FIRST_PREPARED_XACT_PROC_NUMBER). >> >> Fixed those and some other comment work, and pushed. Thanks! >> > > Thanks! what are your thoughts about adding a test like the one > here [1] ? This allows us to test correct handling of prepared > transaction dummy procs. The asserts added will not cover > this case. > > What do you think? > > [1] > [https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA5RZ0twq5bNMq0r0QNoopQnAEv%2BJ3qJNCrLs7HVqTEntBhJ%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com] I support: test for bug fixed is a good thing.
-- regards Yura Sokolov aka funny-falcon
