> On Mar 24, 2026, at 09:23, Gyan Sreejith <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 2:24 AM Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> +       /* Build timestamp directory path */
> +       len = snprintf(logdir, MAXPGPATH, "%s/%s", log_basedir, timestamp);
> +
> +       if (len >= MAXPGPATH)
> +               pg_fatal("directory path for log files, %s/%s, is too long",
> +                                logdir, timestamp);
> ```
> > In the pg_fatal call, I believe logdir should be log_basedir.
> We are writing into logdir, and the if will be true only if it is too long. 
> Hence we should be checking logdir.

Not sure if I stated my comment clearly. The “logdir” is build from (“%s/%s, 
log_basedir, timestamp), however, in the pg_fatal, you are printing (“%s/%s”, 
logdir, timestamp), here logdir has included a truncated timestamp as it is too 
long, and so the fatal message will be 
“log_basedir/truncated-timestamp/timestamp”. So the pg_fatal should be:
```
        report_createsub_fatal("directory path for log files, %s/%s, is too 
long”,
                      log_basedir, timestamp);
```

> 
> > The biggest problem I see with this patch is here. internal_log_file_write 
> > doesn’t handle “%m”. I think we can check the implementation of 
> > pg_log_generic_v how %m is handled. The key code snippet is:
> ```
> > errno = save_errno;
> 
> > va_copy(ap2, ap);
> > required_len = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, ap2) + 1;
> > va_end(ap2);
> ```
> > Where, vsnprintf points to pg_vsnprintf, and pg_vsnprintf calls dopr to 
> > handle %m.
> I have saved and restored errno similar to that. The code snippet you pointed 
> out is, as far as I understand, where they are calculating how much space to 
> allocate (including the \0 at the end). I think it will be handled 
> automatically as long as errno is not overwritten - which it will now be. 
> Thank you!

I verified with v17, %m works now.

> 
> >The other problem is, with internal_log_file_write, HINT, DETAIL prefix are 
> >no longer printed, is that intentional?
> I could add a switch-case to print it out. Is that important? What do you 
> think?

I personally prefer to keep those prefixes, which helps keep the log messages 
in a consistent style.

> 
> <v17-0001-Add-a-new-argument-l-logdir-to-pg_createsubscrib.patch>

One comment on v17.
```
+       if (internal_log_file_fp != NULL)
+       {
+               if (fclose(internal_log_file_fp) != 0)
+                       report_createsub_fatal("could not close %s/%s.log: %m", 
logdir, INTERNAL_LOG_FILE_NAME);
+               internal_log_file_fp = NULL;
+       }
```

As the error is about internal_log_file_fp, meaning it may no longer able to 
write to internal_log_file_fp anymore, we should avoid use 
report_createsub_fatal to log the error again. Maybe just a pg_fatal(), or just 
log to stderr.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/






Reply via email to