On 2018/09/27 23:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2018-Sep-27, Amit Langote wrote: > >> Sorry I couldn't reply sooner, but the following of your proposed text >> needs to be updated a bit: >> >> + <listitem> >> + <para> >> + Having a "default" partition for storing data that does not match a >> + partition key >> + </para> >> + </listitem> >> >> I think "does not match a partition key" is not accurate. Description of >> default partitions further below in the release notes says this: >> >> "The default partition can store rows that don't match any of the other >> defined partitions, and is searched accordingly." >> >> So, we could perhaps write it as: >> >> Having a "default" partition for storing data that does not match any of >> the remaining partitions > > Yeah, I agree that "a partition key" is not the right term to use there > (and that term is used in the press release text also). However I don't > think "remaining" is the right word there either, because it sounds as > if you're removing something. > > For the Spanish translation of the press release, we ended up using the > equivalent of "for the data that does not match any other partition".
Yeah, "any other partition" is what the existing description uses too, so: Having a "default" partition for storing data that does not match any other partition Thanks, Amit
