On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:07 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:38 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> (But it might be worth choosing slightly less > >> generic object names, to avoid a conflict against other sub-tests > >> later in that script.) > > > The function name and statement name seems okay to me. How about > > changing the table name to fooarr or arrtest? > > Up to you. >
Okay, I have pushed the test case patch on HEAD. Attached is the code-fix patch, let's wait for a day so that we have all the results which can help us to discuss the merits of this patch. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
fix_datum_serialization_v4.patch
Description: Binary data
