Hi, On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 at 02:20, Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 2:54 PM Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote: > > I did try creating an archive of an install, but that ends up with a good > > bit > > of additional complexity, because the installations aren't relocatable > > (there > > are header paths that are patched during install, apparently). And where the > > install should be depends on the runner type, larger runners don't have D:, > > but slower runners require using D:. I think Bilal hacked further on my > > experiments around this, but I don't quite know where that stands. It's > > certainly not a trivial change. > > Huh. (How does the current robocopy relocation work, then?)
The current robocopy step happens before the packages are installed. Therefore, it seems there is nothing problematic with the default MSYS installation, but rather that packages installed later cause the problem. -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
