Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-10-03 13:18:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Having said that, maybe there's a case for changing the type spec
>> in only the va_arg() call, and leaving snprintf's related local
>> variables as int64. (Is that what you actually meant?) Then,
>> if long long really is different from int64, at least we have
>> predictable truncation behavior after fetching the value, rather
>> than undefined behavior while fetching it.
> Hm. I guess that'd be a bit better, but I'm not sure it's worth it. How
> about we simply add a static assert that long long isn't bigger than
> int64?
WFM, I'll make it happen.
regards, tom lane
