Hello, At Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:44:23 +0800, Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote in > While testing “[d7965d65f] Add rudimentary table prioritization to > autovacuum”, I noticed a small doc issue. > > In monitoring.sgml, it states: > ``` > <row> > <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> > <structfield>vacuum_score</structfield> <type>double precision</type> > </para> > <para> > Vacuum component score. Scores greater than or equal to > <xref linkend="guc-autovacuum-vacuum-score-weight"/> indicate that > autovacuum would vacuum the table (unless autovacuum is disabled). > </para></entry> > </row> > ```
If I understand this correctly, aren't the *_score_weight settings used to prioritize candidate tables, rather than to determine whether a table needs vacuuming or analyzing in the first place? Regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
