> I guess that may be how the current wording came from. But it seems a bit > indirect to describe it that way, because the weight itself does not > determine if autovacuum would vacuum or analyze the table. > > Rewriting the doc more broadly would be a larger change. This small patch is > only meant to avoid the confusion shown by the test earlier, where the score > is equal to the weight but do_vacuum is false.
Hi, Thanks for reporting. I took a look and agree with your doc changes. do_vacuum/do_analyze will not be true for cases where the individual component scores are less than or equal to the weight. The patch LGTM -- Sami Imseih Amazon Web Services (AWS)
